Trademark News & Screw-ups AB/InBev, Jealous Protectors Of Trademark, Pretty Blatantly Committing Trademark Infringement

The one thing I'm not clear on is the relevance of the alleged fact that AB "sat on the trademark" for 6 years. Patagonia, the apparel brand, is indeed well-known since the 1960s. AB is setting up pop-up stores in locations where the relevant audience knows of Patagonia, the apparel brand. The logos carry some similarity. So what difference does it make if AB didn't immediately start selling their beer on a massive scale back in 2012? If they did, would it be less of an infringement? The only reason it's part of the story is that in Patagonia's attorneys' mind, this paints AB in a darker light, makes them just that much more of a villain. This is a strategy that can easily backfire. Desperation is never a good thing in legal proceedings. But neither is building a mental association between two identical brands in two separate industries by aligning the two together in the minds of potential customers. We'll see where this goes.

The video below features Andrei Mincov's commentary of this article.



Pick from the topics below or use our search system.

And make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel for more free educational content.

Disclaimer: Please note that this post and this video are not and are not intended as legal advice. Your situation may be different from the facts assumed in this post or video. Your reading this post or watching this video does not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and Trademark Factory International Inc., and you should not rely on this post or this video as the only source of information to make important decisions about your intellectual property.