Trademark News & Screw-ups Federal judge sides with Wrigley over vape liquid trademark infringement suit

It's a very important ruling, with a somewhat predictable result. The deliberate use of someone else's branding, even if done for products and services different from those for which the original trademark was registered, can still be problematic, if such use is unquestionably targeting that particular brand. In other words, the e-juice company was slapped not because they used a name that happens to be the trademarked by someone else for an unrelated product. It was slapped because they were deliberately imitating the branding of a particular trademark owner. That didn't go so well.

The video below features Andrei Mincov's commentary of this article.



Pick from the topics below or use our search system.

And make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel for more free educational content.

Disclaimer: Please note that this post and this video are not and are not intended as legal advice. Your situation may be different from the facts assumed in this post or video. Your reading this post or watching this video does not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and Trademark Factory International Inc., and you should not rely on this post or this video as the only source of information to make important decisions about your intellectual property.