Trademark News & Screw-ups Rihanna sued over F.U. Logo F.U., RiRi ... You Jacked Our Logo!!!

This is an interesting one. Freedom United does not own the trademark for letters "F.U." They own a design mark for big letters "F.U." on top of the words "FREEDOM UNITED" in a smaller font. They could not trademark "F.U." by itself because this mark would likely be considered derogatory and unregistrable in the U.S. This may change soon but it's beyond the scope of this comment. So if they don't and can't own "F.U.," does "FU FENTY UNIVERSITY" infringe "FU FREEDOM UNITED?" Puma's and Rihanna's argument will be that the only common element, is the "F.U.," which is unprotectable by itself. Freedom United's argument will be that they own a combined mark that does not only cover the words but also a distinctive design with big letters FU at the top with some smaller text below. At Freedom United's claim is precisely that this design (big letters FU at the top with some smaller text below) is being copied by Puma and Rihanna. This is probably one of those very rare cases when having a combined mark is more beneficial than owning a word mark. We'll see where this dispute will end up.

The video below features Andrei Mincov's commentary of this article.



Pick from the topics below or use our search system.

And make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel for more free educational content.

Disclaimer: Please note that this post and this video are not and are not intended as legal advice. Your situation may be different from the facts assumed in this post or video. Your reading this post or watching this video does not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and Trademark Factory International Inc., and you should not rely on this post or this video as the only source of information to make important decisions about your intellectual property.