Trademark News & Screw-ups Supreme Court to hear challenge to ban on profane trademarks

It's good news, and hopefully, the old rule will be overturned to allow brand owners to trademark their brands - even if someone might be offended. Profane or not profane, if it functions as a trademark, that is, allows the market to tell your products and services from identical or similar products or services, then it should not be the government's role to critique if your brand is in good taste. So with this decision, the Supreme Court can not only get FUCT trademarked, it will actually bring us closer to the third and final chapter of a potential trilogy. First, SCOTUS ruled that disparaging terms could be trademarked. Now, it may rule that profane terms could be trademarked. Next, hopefully, it will rule that terms that relate to illegal activities could be trademarked, which would finally open the door to Federal registration of marijuana trademarks. When SCOTUS rules that trademark registration does not mean the government's endorsement of the message conveyed by the trademark, the next step is to recognize that trademark registration does not mean the government's endorsement of what the trademark owner does with the trademark. This way, a trademark that covers the manufacture and sale of marijuana products would not mean that the federal government allows the activity. It would just mean that no one else can use the brand to engage in such activity.

The video below features Andrei Mincov's commentary of this article.

THINKING OF TRADEMARKING YOU BRAND?

DISCOVER MODE

Pick from the topics below or use our search system.

And make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel for more free educational content.

Disclaimer: Please note that this post and this video are not and are not intended as legal advice. Your situation may be different from the facts assumed in this post or video. Your reading this post or watching this video does not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and Trademark Factory International Inc., and you should not rely on this post or this video as the only source of information to make important decisions about your intellectual property.