The Process
This response framework describes U.S. examination. For a CIPO report or Canadian refusal, use the Canadian notice and review procedures rather than copying U.S. deadlines.
Abandonment is a separate application status, often caused by failure to submit a timely complete response or another required filing. It does not mean that every issue was decided on its merits. Revival may be available for qualifying unintentional delay, but it has short deadlines and specific requirements. Check the official status and notice immediately; a new application does not automatically preserve the old filing date.
For most U.S. Section 1 or 44 applications, an Office action response is due three months from the issue date. One paid three-month extension may be requested before the initial deadline. Section 66(a) applications generally have six months and are not eligible for that extension. The particular notice and applicable rules control.
A final Office action means the examiner has made an issue final. Depending on the matter, the applicant may seek reconsideration, file an appeal to the TTAB, or use another appropriate review procedure. A request for reconsideration does not extend the time to appeal. Do not wait for a reconsideration decision while allowing the appeal deadline to pass.
An examining attorney may issue a non-final Office action identifying legal objections or missing requirements. It is an opportunity to respond, not a final decision that the application is lost. Read every issue, identify permitted amendments and evidence, and calendar the response deadline.
An Office action, final refusal and abandonment are different
The Reasons
What are the three most common reasons for Office Actions and application denial?
Number One:
- List of Goods and Services (Nice Classification)
- Logo Filing Issues
- Appropriate US Representation
These issues are either problems with the application or the trademark itself. Usually, problems with the application are easier to fix (if you understand the process and have sufficient knowledge). The most common is your list of goods and services.
You must assign the appropriate Nice Classifications for each of the goods and services under your trademark. If your examiner feels that your trademark belongs in more classes, you must pay additional government fees for the extra classes.
The description must be sufficiently specific and clear regarding your monopoly claims. Generally, a reasonable response to an Office Action can overcome objections.
When seeking trademark protection for your logo, you must describe it in words and specify if you want to claim color as a feature. Examiners frequently file Office Actions to correct deficiencies in this area.
For USPTO matters, representation depends on domicile, not simply citizenship or the country where a company was incorporated. A foreign-domiciled applicant must be represented by a qualified U.S.-licensed attorney. For an individual, domicile generally means the principal home; for a legal entity, its principal place of business. Review the USPTO’s requirements for the actual applicant.
Number Two:
- Application Does Not Distinguish Your Goods and Services from Others
- The mark is ornamental or otherwise fails to identify source
The Filing Is for a Functional Feature and Not to Distinguish the Brand
A trademark’s purpose is to distinguish your brand from others offering similar products and services. The examiner will refuse your application if it does not reach this threshold.
You cannot trademark something that does not set you apart, like “Made in the USA,” “Drive Safely,” or the TM symbol.
A variation of this is the ornamental trademark, attempting to register an image or phrase of artistic or literary value but is not an indicator of your brand.
Similarly, functional trademarks identify a functioning feature of your product and not the brand that allows the market to identify the product.
And finally, is the descriptiveness objection when the examiner feels your mark merely indicates the quality, characteristics, or features of your product, For example, “5G Phone”, “Color Printer,” or “Timely Accounting.”
A merely descriptive mark may be refused on the Principal Register unless an applicable basis for registration, such as acquired distinctiveness, is established. Generic terms cannot identify a single source for the named goods or services. Descriptiveness, ornamentation and functionality are distinct issues and should not be treated as one refusal.
Supplemental registration provides some benefits, including potential citation against later confusingly similar applications, but it does not automatically block every later filing or guarantee success against infringement. It lacks several Principal Register presumptions and cannot become incontestable under Section 15. Registration volume is not the legal test for descriptiveness.
A Section 1(b) application generally needs a timely acceptable allegation of use before it can proceed to the Supplemental Register. Section 44 has different use rules, and Section 66(a) applications cannot use the Supplemental Register. An amendment may change the effective filing date.
The U.S. Supplemental Register may be available for certain marks capable of distinguishing goods or services that do not qualify for the Principal Register. Generic matter and functional features do not become registrable by moving to this register. Eligibility and the filing basis must be assessed.
When the Supplemental Register may be relevant
These are common categories of issues, not an exhaustive or statistically ranked list. The correct response depends on the actual Office action and application record.
Depending on the facts, options may include supported arguments, permitted narrowing of goods or services, or a carefully assessed consent agreement. Opposition to a pending application or cancellation of a registration is a separate proceeding requiring proper grounds and deadlines, not an automatic response to every citation.
An earlier registered mark can support a likelihood-of-confusion refusal. An earlier-filed pending application may lead to suspension while its outcome is determined. Similarity of the marks and the relationship between the goods or services matter; an identical class number is neither necessary nor sufficient.
' width='400' height='200'/%3E%3C/svg%3E)
